<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google terms do not claim ownership of your content - Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewwwblog.com/google-terms-do-not-claim-ownership-of-your-content-chrome.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/google-terms-do-not-claim-ownership-of-your-content-chrome.html</link>
	<description>Observing the Web.. With an apple macbook!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/google-terms-do-not-claim-ownership-of-your-content-chrome.html/comment-page-1#comment-4286</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=690#comment-4286</guid>
		<description>didn't know about this controversy... but if this was true than G has crossed the line... glad they have explained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t know about this controversy&#8230; but if this was true than G has crossed the line&#8230; glad they have explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
