<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to merge folders in Windows 7 easily?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html</link>
	<description>Observing the Web.. With an apple macbook!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed up with MSoft - again</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-32304</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed up with MSoft - again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-32304</guid>
		<description>Pretty crappy and useless when mergeing more than 4 files though. 

A real merge will involve thousands of files, and you have to nurse over all 5000 conflicts *because you cannot say - only overwrite if newer*. I mean what the hell! 

A complete shambles from Microsoft again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty crappy and useless when mergeing more than 4 files though. </p>
<p>A real merge will involve thousands of files, and you have to nurse over all 5000 conflicts *because you cannot say &#8211; only overwrite if newer*. I mean what the hell! </p>
<p>A complete shambles from Microsoft again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Host Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-25211</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Host Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-25211</guid>
		<description>Thats really a nice news as it avoids lot of confusion while searching the files , and i think this even may reduce the stress on the RAM and makes your devise run faster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats really a nice news as it avoids lot of confusion while searching the files , and i think this even may reduce the stress on the RAM and makes your devise run faster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-24610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 04:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-24610</guid>
		<description>Merging doesn&#039;t always work. It keeps saying that it will take too much disk space, yeah if you duplicate the entire folder and don&#039;t merge, seems it is calculating 100% of the source folder and assuming that 100% of it will be transfered during the merge, before actually looking to see if there are any duplicate files and subtracting that amount to find the actual disk space needed after everything is said and done. 

In other words if there was a bowl that can hold 10 pieces of fruit(5 apples and 5 oranges) and there are already 5 apples in the destination bowl and 1000 trillion trillion apples  and 5 oranges in the source bowl and I am asked to merge the bowls of fruit but only transfer the 5 needed oranges I should be able to do this. But Windows 7 is saying but there is too much fruit and if I merge the destination bowl will be full, and I say no Windows 7 you were only supposed to transfer the oranges during the merge because thats what&#039;s missing. See my point? I found a fatal flaw in file merging. Or the computer that&#039;s supposed to be able to do millions of double precision floating point operations per second just got it&#039;s butt handed to it by a lowly one or two flop human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merging doesn&#8217;t always work. It keeps saying that it will take too much disk space, yeah if you duplicate the entire folder and don&#8217;t merge, seems it is calculating 100% of the source folder and assuming that 100% of it will be transfered during the merge, before actually looking to see if there are any duplicate files and subtracting that amount to find the actual disk space needed after everything is said and done. </p>
<p>In other words if there was a bowl that can hold 10 pieces of fruit(5 apples and 5 oranges) and there are already 5 apples in the destination bowl and 1000 trillion trillion apples  and 5 oranges in the source bowl and I am asked to merge the bowls of fruit but only transfer the 5 needed oranges I should be able to do this. But Windows 7 is saying but there is too much fruit and if I merge the destination bowl will be full, and I say no Windows 7 you were only supposed to transfer the oranges during the merge because thats what&#8217;s missing. See my point? I found a fatal flaw in file merging. Or the computer that&#8217;s supposed to be able to do millions of double precision floating point operations per second just got it&#8217;s butt handed to it by a lowly one or two flop human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorru Offensus</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-15205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorru Offensus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-15205</guid>
		<description>hey ^^ i was wondering if there was any way to do this faster...i have a lot of folders to merge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey ^^ i was wondering if there was any way to do this faster&#8230;i have a lot of folders to merge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-13774</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 22:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-13774</guid>
		<description>Even norton commander circa 1988 managed to allow you to option for newer files are preserved in the event of conflict.  Be nice of MS ccaught up one day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even norton commander circa 1988 managed to allow you to option for newer files are preserved in the event of conflict.  Be nice of MS ccaught up one day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-11983</link>
		<dc:creator>manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-11983</guid>
		<description>i have 2 folders .both the folders have text files inside it. Folder no 1 have text files &amp; Folder no 2 also has the same text files.. can u tell me how i can merge both the folders into 1. without getting the text files replaced.. plss help ..thankyou so much..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have 2 folders .both the folders have text files inside it. Folder no 1 have text files &amp; Folder no 2 also has the same text files.. can u tell me how i can merge both the folders into 1. without getting the text files replaced.. plss help ..thankyou so much..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dharmesh</title>
		<link>http://www.thewwwblog.com/merge-folders-windows-7.html#comment-11636</link>
		<dc:creator>dharmesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewwwblog.com/?p=3122#comment-11636</guid>
		<description>nice. but i still prefer windows xp over 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice. but i still prefer windows xp over 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

